Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 1;2019(6):CD004048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004048.pub4
Study Reason for exclusion
Axelson 2011 Unclear diagnostic criteria, unclear participant characteristics, unclear if open or blinded, unclear randomisation
Bowden 2008 Open‐label study
Brockington 1978 Nonstandard diagnostic process. Not clearly participants with bipolar disorder. Unclear if randomised or not
Calabrese 2002 Mixture of depressed, euthymic and manic participants. No subgroup of manic participants presented
Calabrese 2005 Complex study. Recruited participants who were either euthymic or manic. Those who were manic had an open‐label stabilisation prior to randomisation. Then were randomised for maintenance therapy. Not an acute mania study.
Chou 2009 Lithium in both arms of the study
Christie 1989 Open‐label study
El‐Mallakh 2012 Maintenance study ‐ participants not acutely manic
Giannini 1984 Not a RCT
Giannini 1986 Clonidine is not one of the agreed comparators
Goodwin 1979 Lithium vs 'neuroleptics'. No individual drug data
Johnson 1971 No standard diagnostic criteria/method of diagnosis
Kwon 2001 Mixture of depressed and manic participants
NCT00314184 Maintenance study ‐ participants not acutely manic
NCT01166425 Study protocol. Appears to have either not occurred or was replaced by the study which is Findling 2015
Nieto 2014 Naturalistic study, non‐randomised
Okuma 1990 Unclear diagnostic criteria
Pavuluri 2004 Open‐label study and group with Lithium only n = 4 (valproate vs placebo vs placebo + lithium)
Pokorny 1974 Mixture of participants ‐ unipolar and bipolar disorders in all mood states. Unclear diagnostic criteria
Swann 2001 Randomisation occurred after mood stabilisation ‐ so this was a maintenance study
Takahashi 1975 Unclear diagnostic criteria. Unblinded. Non validated outcome measures

RCT: randomised controlled trial