Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 22;5(2):156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.07.004

Table 5.

Effects of dietary treatments on intestinal morphology.

Item Duodenum
Jejunum
Ileum
VH, μm CD, μm VH:CD VH, μm CD, μm VH:CD VH, μm CD, μm VH:CD
Organic acid, g/kg Fiber source1
0 No fiber 1,384 233 6.1 1,060abc 188 5.8 536 130 4.0
SF 1,240 215 6.3 843bc 192 4.4 569 130 4.3
IF 1,472 207 7.3 780c 188 4.3 603 171 3.9
1 No fiber 1,228 229 5.3 1,009abc 191 5.5 664 127 5.2
SF 1,512 230 6.8 1,088ab 169 5.0 465 119 4.1
IF 1,485 246 6.3 1,190a 230 4.7 582 162 3.5
Organic acid, g/kg
0 1,365 219 6.6 894b 189 4.8 569 136 4.0
1 1,408 235 6.1 1,096a 196 5.0 570 144 4.3
Fiber source
No fiber 1,306b 231 5.7 1,034 189 5.6 600 129b 4.6
SF 1,376ab 223 6.5 966 180 4.7 517 124b 4.2
IF 1,479a 227 6.8 985 209 4.5 592 166a 3.7
Pooled SEM 142.57 20.02 0.22 95.50 31.51 0.23 100.01 6.11 0.22
P-value
Organic acid 0.433 0.207 0.295 0.001 0.669 0.645 0.984 0.446 0.604
Fiber source 0.047 0.859 0.094 0.602 0.380 0.119 0.460 0.007 0.227
Organic acid × fiber source 0.112 0.403 0.240 0.009 0.297 0.728 0.289 0.948 0.223

SF = soluble fiber; IF = insoluble fiber; VH = villus height; CD = crypt depth.

a, b, c Values in the same column not sharing a common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).

1

Rice hull as IF or sugar beet pulp as SF was supplemented at 30 g/kg to replace silica sand in the basal diet.