Table 1.
Domain/motif name | PfpTKL region (AA) | Data from the literature | PfpTKL annotation data (this study) |
---|---|---|---|
Kinase domain (KD) |
1080–1483 |
Kinase domains are composed of 12 subdomains23, six of which are critical for kinase activity25. PfpTKL lacks some canonical KD subdomains41. PbpTKL is a pseudokinase19. |
PfpTKL KD (Fig. 1a): —belongs to the tyrosine kinase-like (TKL) family42 (Supplementary Fig. S1). —lacks the following subdomains: -I (glycine triad) -II (ATP-binding lysine) although there might be an alignment offset because the PfpTKL KD N-terminal lobe is longer than in reference kinases -III (αC helix glutamate can interact with subdomain II lysine) —includes some specificities: -VIB aspartate (ATP γ-phosphate transfer catalyzer) is mutated to asparagine -a ~50-residue insertion in its activation loop (shown in red in Fig. 1a). |
Bruton’s tyrosine kinase-like (BTK-like) domain |
830–905 (Fig. 1b) |
BTK is named after Dr Ogden Carr Bruton, who discovered X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) in boys in 1952. This cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase (mostly in B lymphocytes) needs to bind lipids via its PH-TH module to adopt an active conformation104. BTK is a promising target in tumors105. |
BTK-like domain: —was predicted by most of the prediction tools we used. —alignment with HsPKA and HsBTK N-terminal lobe sequences shows the conservation of canonical KD subdomains II (this lysine is shaded in red in Fig. 1b), IV (highlighted in gray) and V. —tertiary structure prediction superimposes well with HsBTK N-terminal lobe (Supplementary Fig. S3). |
Membrane occupation recognition nexus (MORN) domain |
MORN1: 19–40 MORN2: 43–63 (Fig. 2a) |
First identified in Junctophilins106, MORN motifs have been shown to bind: -lipids and regulate kinase activity in plant PIPKs107,108 -the cytoskeleton as in TgMORN1109 -membranes and is required for the localization of retinophilin in the Drosophila melanogaster rhabdomere110 |
There is no signal peptide at the N-terminus of PfpTKL. MORN1 follows the MORN motif signature: a 14–16 residue core domain starting with Y/FxG and ending with GxG (Supplementary Fig. S4). MORN2 does not follow a canonical MORN signature but contains a putative N-myristoylation site that is conserved across all Plasmodium species (Fig. 2a). |
RVxF motifs |
RVxF1: 482–486 RVxF2: 1219–1223 (Fig. 2b) |
RVxF motifs: - so-called because of their binding signature111 - are the most frequent binding motifs used by PP1 partners to interact with PP1c112 - can be predicted with consensus sequences (Fig. 2b) |
RVxF1 follows the Meiselbach consensus sequence87. It is located in a low-complexity region, which may increase its interaction potential with PP1c50. It is conserved among PfpTKL homologs in P. praefalciparum, P. reichenowi, P. billcollinsi and P. blacklocki (Fig. 3c). RVXF2 follows the Wakula consensus sequence86. It is located in a basic charged region, which could reinforce its binding potential75. It is conserved across all PfpTKL homologs in the genus Plasmodium (Figs 2b and 3c). |
Sterile alpha motif (SAM) |
299–364 (Fig. 2d) |
SAMs belong to the alpha protein family (289 folds – SCOP database113). They typically fold into 4–5 orthogonal α helices. They are involved in interactions with protein or RNA71,72. In the Plasmodium proteome: - there are four SAMs (PfpTKL, PfTKL1, PfTKL3, PF3D7_0926000)66 - there are two SAM-like domains involved in interactions with RNA (prototypical HTH motifs) in Pfg27114,115. |
The PfpTKL SAM domain is predicted to fold classically (Fig. 2c). The PfpTKL SAM core domain includes all SAM canonical residues (Fig. 2d). The PfpTKL SAM domain is close to SAMs involved in protein–protein interactions (Supplementary Fig. S5). This phylogenetic analysis includes Plasmodium SAM and SAM-like sequences as well as reference SAM and SAM-like sequences across the tree of life. |