Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD006761. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006761.pub2

Comparison 6. Sensitivity analysis no.1.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 MJS>3; Pain score at day 1 7 578 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.71 [‐2.53, ‐0.89]
2 MJS>3; Postoperative bleeding 8 851 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [0.14, 1.11]
3 MJS>3; Urinary retention 8 851 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.42 [0.17, 1.00]
4 MJS>3; Anal stenosis 7 786 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.38 [0.22, 8.52]
5 MJS>3; Symptoms of incontinence at follow‐up 5 639 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.09, 9.61]
6 MJS>3; Hospital stay in days 4 380 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.02 [‐0.45, 0.41]