Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD007410. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007410.pub2

Comparison 3. Electroacupuncture versus relaxation.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Hot flush frequency (number/day) 1 38 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.40 [‐2.18, 1.38]
1.1 Electroacupuncture vs. relaxation 1 38 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.40 [‐2.18, 1.38]
2 Hot flush frequency in cancer trials 1 38 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.14 [‐0.78, 0.50]
2.1 Electroacupuncture vs. relaxation 1 38 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.14 [‐0.78, 0.50]
3 Hot flush severity 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Electroacupuncture vs. relaxation 1 38 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [‐0.85, 1.25]
4 Quality of life 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 Electroacupuncture vs. relaxation 1 38 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 8.3 [‐4.23, 20.83]