Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 6;2013(11):CD009853. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009853.pub2
Detail Fee‐for‐service only Control
Number randomised Dentists: 37
Patients: 925
Dentists: 39
Patients: 957 
Number analysed Dentists: 33 (89.2%)
Patients: 698 (75.5%)
Dentists: 35 (89.7%)
Patients: 730 (76.3%)
Number not analysed and reasons Dentists:
  • Lost to follow‐up

    • 4 (10.8%)

    • Reason: 2 dentists left the study and 2 refused to take part after randomisation


Patients:
  • Lost to follow‐up:

    • 161 (17.4%)

    • Reason: Most of the children were patients of the dentists who were lost to follow‐up but also there were 39 missing patient records

  • Excluded from analysis:

    • 66 (7.1%)

    • Reason: Lack of erupted second permanent molars

Dentists:
  • Lost to follow‐up

    • 4 (10.3%)

    • Reason: 2 dentists left the study and 2 refused to take part after randomisation


Patients:
  • Lost to follow‐up:

    • 127 (13.3%)

    • Reason: Most of the children were patients of the dentists who were lost to follow‐up but also there were 48 missing patient records

  • Excluded from analysis:

    • 100 (10.4%)

    • Reason: Lack of erupted second permanent molars