Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 6;2013(11):CD009853. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009853.pub2
Detail Fee‐for‐service only Control
Dental practice‐level variables for minimisation
Number of partners
Single‐handed 13 (39) 14 (40)
Two/three partners 10 (30) 9 (26)
Four or more 10 (30) 12 (34)
Deprivation area of dental practice – n (%)
4 18 (55) 16 (46)
5 8 (24) 10 (29)
6/7 (most deprived) 7 (21) 9 (26)
Restorative fissure sealant claims 2002 ‐ n (%)
None 9 (27) 11 (31)
1 ‐ 5 10 (30) 8 (23)
6 or more 14 (42) 16 (46)
Throughput 11‐ to 13‐year‐olds ‐ n (%)
Low (48 ‐ 95) 9 (27) 9 (26)
Medium (96 ‐ 143) 14 (42) 11 (31)
High (> 143) 10 (30) 5 (43)
Other dental practice/dentist‐level variables
Child patients with sealant on any second permanent molar – mean % (SD) 32.8 (26.5) 38.4 (28.9)
Child patients with sealant on any first permanent molar – mean % (SD) 10.7 (16.6) 13.4 (15.1)
Cluster size ‐ median (interquartile range) 19 (22, 24) 20 (22, 24)
High population density (> 100 people/hectare) ‐ n (%) 8 (25) 9 (25)
Hygienist in dental team ‐ n (%) 14 (42) 16 (46)
Gender of dentist ‐ n (%)
Female 12 (36) 15 (43)
Male 21 (64) 20 (36)
Dentist working part‐time (< 9 sessions/week) ‐ n (%) 6 (19) 6 (17)
Number of years qualified as a dentist ‐ mean (SD) 18.9 (8.6) 19.7 (8.2)
Patient‐level variables
Age of children ‐ mean (SD) 13.21 (0.96) 13.24 (0.98)
Gender of children ‐ n (%)
Female 348 (49.9) 368 (50.4)
Male 350 (50.1) 362 (49.6)
Deprivation area of dental practice – n (%)
4 375 (53.7) 334 (45.8)
5 173 (24.8) 220 (30.1)
6/7 (most deprived) 150 (21.5) 176 (24.1)
Sealant on any second permanent molar – n (%) 75 (10.7) 98 (13.4)
Sealant on any first permanent molar – n (%) 229 (32.8) 280 (38.4)
n: number of participants
SD: standard deviation