Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2019 May 4;1121:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.05.004

Table 3.

Effects of protein concentration and use of slurry vs. on-column entrapment for Con Aa

Entrapment method
and Con A
concentration
Specific retention
factor, MUM
Protein content
(mg/g silica)
Protein content
(μmol dimer/g silica)
Slurry method lOmg/mLCon A 13.4 (±1.2) 17.6 (±2.3) 0.33 (±0.04)
On-column method 1.0 mg/mLCon A 16.0 (±1.2) 21.0 (±2.6) 0.40 (±0.05)
On-column method 10 mg/mLCon A 34.7 (±2.9) 45.6 (±5.7) 0.86 (±0.11)
a

The numbers in parentheses represent a range of ± 1 S.D., as obtained for a set of three injections. The specific retention factors were measured at 0.5 mL/min and 20 °C and have been corrected for any binding by MUM with the support in the absence of MUM. The protein content of each support was calculated from the specific retention factor for MUM by using a molar mass for the monomer of Con A of 26.5 kDa, the measured void volume of the column, the known packing density for the support (0.45 g/cm3), and an association equilibrium constant of 4.5 × 105 M−1 for MUM with Con A at pH 5.0 and 25 °C [28].