Table 1. Grading systems in Consensus Group recommendations.
Level | Type of evidence | Grades of recommendation |
---|---|---|
1a | Systematic review with homogeneity of randomized controlled trials | A (Grades of recommendation) |
1b | Individual randomized controlled trials with a narrow confidence interval | |
1c | All or non-related outcome | |
2a | Systematic review with homogeneity of cohort studies | B (Grades of recommendation) |
2b | Individual cohort studies (including low-quality randomized controlled trials) | |
2c | “Outcomes” research ecological studies | |
3a | Systematic review with homogeneity of case-control studies | |
3b | Individual case-control study | |
4 | Case-series (and poor-quality cohort and case-controlled studies) | C (Level 4 studies or extrapolation from level 2 or 3 studies) |
5 | Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiological/bench research | D (Level 5 studies or troublingly inconsistent or inconclusive studies of any level) |
Levels of evidence are adapted from the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine. Grades of recommendation are adapted from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.