Skip to main content
. 2019 May 31;11:1758835919853971. doi: 10.1177/1758835919853971

Table 3.

Association between pathological response and baseline clinicopathological features.

Pathological response
All
p valueª
Complete pCR
(RCB 0)
Partial
(RCB I, II and III)
n % n % n %
Variable 24 (42) 34 (58) 58 (100) NA
Serum menopausal status
 Premenopausal 5 (21) 15 (44) 20 (34) 0.119
 Postmenopausal 19 (79) 19 (56) 38 (66)
Nodal, clinical status
 N0 14 (58) 14 (41) 28 (48) 0.198
 N1 + N2 10 (42) 20 (59) 30 (52)
Clinical stage*
 IIA + IIB 15 (63) 17 (50) 32 (55) 0.346
 IIIA + IIIB 9 (37) 17 (50) 26 (45)
Tumor grade
 2 13 (54) 18 (53) 31 (53) 0.927
 3 11 (46) 16 (47) 27 (47)
Hormone receptor§
ER or PgR positive 17 (71) 25 (74) 42 (72) 0.821
ER and PgR negative 7 (29) 9 (26) 16 (28)
Lymphovascular invasion
 Present 1 (4) 2 (6) 3 (5) 1.000
 Absent 23 (96) 32 (94) 55 (95)
Necrosis
 Present 5 (21) 6 (18) 11 (19) 0.760
 Absent 19 (79) 28 (82) 47 (81)
Lymphocytic infiltrate
 Present 15 (63) 19 (56) 34 (59) 0.614
 Absent 9 (37) 15 (44) 24 (41)
Ki67 labeling index§
 <20 0 (0) 5 (15) 5 (9) 0.070
 ⩾20 24 (100) 29 (85) 53 (91)
p53 (n = 56) , §
 <10 7 (30) 16 (48) 23 (41) 0.177
 ⩾10 16 (70) 17 (52) 33 (59)
β-catenin (n = 56), §
 Plasma membrane positive 17 (71) 30 (94) 47 (84) 0.030
 Nuclei/cytoplasm positive 7 (29) 2 (6) 9 (16)
E-cadherin (n = 56), §
 Positive 23 (96) 33 (97) 56 (100) NA.
 Negative 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

ER, estrogen receptor; PgR, progesterone receptor; pCR, pathological complete response; RCB, residual cancer burden.

*

TNM classification according to the International Union Against Cancer, Grading according to Bloom–Richardson, §Immunohistochemistry was performed according to local practice.

n = 56 because the material was consumed in two patients.