Description |
Percentage of DAEs performed for an appropriate indication |
Domain |
Pre-procedure |
Category |
Process |
Rationale |
Adherence to appropriate indications for DAE (in accordance with ESGE guidance) ensures patient safety (by a reduction of risk associated with unnecessary procedures), may improve diagnostic and therapeutic yield, and enhances efficiency relating to appropriate allocation of limited resources |
Construct |
Denominator: DAE procedures performed Numerator: Proportion of DAE procedures performed for an appropriate indication: therapy in patients with positive findings at capsule endoscopy; patients with obscure GI bleeding when SBCE is not available or is contraindicated; in selected cases of ongoing overt obscure GI bleeding; patients with ongoing obscure GI bleeding and an unremarkable capsule endoscopy; for biopsy in patients with noncontributory ileocolonoscopy and with suspicion of Crohn disease on radiologic imaging tests or capsule endoscopy; in Crohn disease patients, when endotherapy is indicated; when an imaging test shows suspicion of small-bowel tumor; for biopsy in patients in whom there is an uncertain diagnosis of small-bowel tumor at capsule endoscopy; when a submucosal mass is detected by capsule endoscopy; in patients with inherited polyposis syndromes when polypectomy is indicated; in patients with nonresponsive or refractory celiac disease for biopsy Exclusions: None Calculation: Proportion (%) Level of analysis: Service level Frequency: Yearly and/or for a sample of 50 DAEs |
Standards |
Minimum standard: ≥95% Target standard: ≥95% Regular audit should be encouraged to assess whether procedures are being performed for recognized indications After evaluation and adjustment, close monitoring should be performed with a further audit within 12 months |
Consensus agreement |
100% |
PICO number |
1 (see Supporting information, DAE file) |
Evidence grading |
Moderate-quality evidence |