Skip to main content
. 2019 May 15;7(5):614–641. doi: 10.1177/2050640619850365
Minor performance measure Accurate photodocumentation
Description Proportion of cases with accurate photodocumentation of detected lesions
Domain Identification of pathology
Category Process
Rationale It is recommended that photodocumentation is used to record findings in all DAE cases
Construct Denominator: All patients undergoing DAE with pathology/lesions detected Numerator: Patients undergoing DAE with photodocumentation of identified pathology/lesions detected Exclusions: None Calculation: Proportion (%) Level of analysis: Service and individual level Frequency: Yearly and/or for a sample of 100 SBCEs
Standards Minimum standard: ≥95% Target standard: ≥95% After evaluation and adjustment, close monitoring should be performed with a further audit within 12 months
Consensus agreement 90.9%
PICO number 6 (see Supporting information, DAE file)
Evidence grading Very low quality of evidence