Table 13.
Average accuracy for Condition B during the classification of feet and tongue movements and using the classical filter configuration (1–100).
| Subject | Higuchi | Katz | AR |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 0.55 ± 0.03∗ | 0.57 ± 0.04∗ | 0.62 ± 0.04 |
| A2 | 0.51 ± 0.03∗ | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.03∗ |
| A3 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | 0.55 ± 0.04∗ | 0.54 ± 0.05∗ |
| A4 | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 0.50 ± 0.04 | 0.51 ± 0.03 |
| A5 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.51 ± 0.02∗ | 0.50 ± 0.02∗ |
| A6 | 0.58 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 0.55 ± 0.04∗ |
| A7 | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 0.60 ± 0.07 |
| A8 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | 0.72 ± 0.05 | 0.64 ± 0.05∗ |
| A9 | 0.56 ± 0.03∗ | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.65 ± 0.06∗ |
| Average | 0.58 ± 0.04 | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.04 |
∗Accuracies that are significantly different compared with the best result. Values in bold indicate the best average accuracy achieved from the different feature extraction techniques.