Skip to main content
. 2019 May 20;2019:9174307. doi: 10.1155/2019/9174307

Table 13.

Average accuracy for Condition B during the classification of feet and tongue movements and using the classical filter configuration (1–100).

Subject Higuchi Katz AR
A1 0.55 ± 0.03∗ 0.57 ± 0.04∗ 0.62 ± 0.04
A2 0.51 ± 0.03∗ 0.59 ± 0.05 0.51 ± 0.03∗
A3 0.62 ± 0.03 0.55 ± 0.04∗ 0.54 ± 0.05∗
A4 0.50 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.04 0.51 ± 0.03
A5 0.54 ± 0.05 0.51 ± 0.02∗ 0.50 ± 0.02∗
A6 0.58 ± 0.05 0.59 ± 0.03 0.55 ± 0.04∗
A7 0.60 ± 0.05 0.62 ± 0.07 0.60 ± 0.07
A8 0.73 ± 0.04 0.72 ± 0.05 0.64 ± 0.05∗
A9 0.56 ± 0.03∗ 0.71 ± 0.05 0.65 ± 0.06∗
Average 0.58 ± 0.04 0.60 ± 0.04 0.57 ± 0.04

∗Accuracies that are significantly different compared with the best result. Values in bold indicate the best average accuracy achieved from the different feature extraction techniques.