Table 2C.
IDI | NRI | |||||
IDI (%) | 95% CI (%) | P value | NRI (%) | 95% CI (%) | P value | |
Entire cohort (n=580) | ||||||
GWTG-HF | ||||||
+IMRS | 2.14 | 0.99 to 3.30 | <0.001 | 36.2 | 17.5 to 54.9 | <0.001 |
Subgroup with NT-proBNP (n=341) | ||||||
GWTG-HF | ||||||
+IMRS | 1.64 | 0.49 to 2.78 | 0.005 | 25.8 | 3.63 to 49.9 | 0.02 |
+NT-proBNP | 3.15 | 1.52 to 4.78 | <0.001 | 36.3 | 14.4 to 58.3 | 0.001 |
+IMRS and NT-proBNP | 4.03 | 2.13 to 5.93 | <0.001 | 39.9 | 18.0 to 61.8 | <0.001 |
IMRS | ||||||
+NT-proBNP | 3.26 | 1.62 to 4.90 | <0.001 | 46.2 | 24.4 to 68.0 | <0.001 |
Variables included in the analysis were IMRS, GWTG-HF risk score, CAD, history of atrial fibrillation, BMI, haemoglobin and log NT-proBNP. HRs normalised for SD. Log likelihood ratio −760.90 for entire cohort; log likelihood ratio −573.90 for subgroup with NT-proBNP available
Variables included in the analysis were age, CAD, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, heart rate, BMI, WCC, haemoglobin, haematocrit, MCV, MCHC, RDW, platelet, sodium, BUN, creatinine, potassium; HRs normalised for SD. Log likelihood ratio −742.17 for entire cohort; loglikelihood ratio −562.80 for subgroup with NT-proBNP available.
The IDI is the difference between the discrimination slopes of basic models and basic models extended with a predictor variable. The discrimination slope is the difference in predicted probabilities (%) between subjects with and without event. The NRI reflects the improvement in discriminative power by adding a predictor variable to a Cox model already including one of the tested scores (IMRS or GWTG-HF).
GWTG-HF, Get With the Guidelines – Heart Failure;IMRS, Intermountain Risk Score; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.