Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;16(6):e1002813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002813

Table 3. Comparison between the current trial (MULTI-IMPROD trial) and the pre-validation cohort (IMPROD trial).

Measure  MULTI-IMPROD trial IMPROD trial
Trial duration February 2015–May 2017 March 2013–February 2015
Trial registration NCT02241122 NCT01864135
Patient cohort in total 338 161
Participating centers Turku, Pori, Tampere, Helsinki Turku
Age, mean (SD), years 64 (8) 65 (8)
PSA, median (IQR), μg/l 6.9 (3.9) 7.5 (3.9)
IMPROD bpMRI Likert score
    1–2 75 (22%, 75/338) 38 (23%, 38/161)
    3 66 (20%, 66/338) 24 (14%, 24/161)
    4–5 197 (58%, 197/338) 99 (61%, 99/161)
Sensitivity* 97% (142/146) [93%–99%] 95% (79/83) [88%–98%]
Specificity* 37% (71/192) [31%–44%] 44% (34/78) [33%–55%]
NPV* 95% (71/75) [87%–98%] 90% (34/38) [76%–96%]
PPV* 54% (141/263) [48%–60%] 64% (79/123) [55%–72%]
Accuracy* 63% (217/338) 70% (113/161)

*Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy values are based on binary classification (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1–2 versus 3–5) for predicting prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4. 95% confidence intervals given in brackets.

bpMRI, biparametric magnetic resonance imaging; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; PSA, prostate specific antigen.