TABLE 4.
HR between milk type2 | ||||
High fat (3%) | Medium fat (1.5%) | Low fat (0.5%) | P-trend | |
Participants (reporting intake ≥1 time/wk), n | 6177 | 27,966 | 6566 | — |
Mortality cases, n (%) | 710 (11.5) | 1769 (6.3) | 569 (8.7) | — |
HR (95% CI)2 | ||||
Crude model | Reference | 0.78 (0.71, 0.85)*** | 0.84 (0.75, 0.94)** | 0.002 |
Adjusted model | Reference | 0.90 (0.82, 0.98)* | 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) | 0.101 |
Crude model was adjusted for age and sex, and the adjusted model was further adjusted for BMI, screening year, smoking, education, and energy intake. Participants with missing values for these covariates were excluded in all models. P-trend values were calculated by treating categories of milk as a continuous variable (i.e., high fat = 1, medium fat = 2, and low fat = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Milk type was included in the model as a categorical variable, and high-fat nonfermented milk intake is the reference. The analyses were restricted to consumers reporting exclusive intake of high-, medium-, or low-fat nonfermented milk ≥1 time/wk. Energy was included as reported intake per day as a continuous variable. Additional adjustment for physical activity with exclusions made for missing information did not affect any HR. Models including all subjects and missing values as dummy categories only affected the HR and 95% CI by 1 unit of the second decimal.