Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 3;13:921. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.921

Table 2. Summary of studies investigating the efficacy and toxicity seen in OA treated with chemotherapy.

Cancer type and patients included (age in years) No. of patients Survival outcomes Toxicity outcomes
Smorenburg et al [4] Breast
>65
78 65–75 years old no differences 1. 65–75 years old no differences
2. >80 years old: Only one in ten patients completed chemotherapy
Begg et al [17] Lung
Breast
Colorectal
<65 versus >65
3,000
(Meta-analysis)
Equivalent response rates between <65 and >65 patients 1. No increase in frequency or severity of toxicity in >65 years old versus <65 years old
2. Compliance similar between both groups
Christman et al [18] Breast
<50
50–65
>65

40
60
70
PFS OS 1. Toxicity frequency and severity same across groups
2. Same number of dose delays seen across groups
9.1 months 17.9 months
6.2 months 12.8 months
7.2 months 14.2 months
Crivellari et al [19] Breast
<65 versus >65
299 Same PFS between groups 1. G3 toxicity 17% in >65 years old versus 7% in <65 years old
2. More of >65 years old group received less than expected doses
Hurria et al [20] Lung, Gastrointestinal, Breast, Gynae Genitourinary
>65
500 Not assessed 1. 53% of patients experienced G3–5 toxicity with 2% grade 5 toxicity
Extermann et al [21] Any Cancer
>70
518 Not assessed 1. 64% of patients experienced severe toxicity
Lund et al [22] Colorectal
<70 versus >70
529 1. No difference in age-adjusted disease-free survival (DFS) or 10 years mortality
2. Poor performance status across all ages led to worse DFS and 10 years mortality rates
1. No age-adjusted difference in G3–5 toxicity
2. Elderly patients more frequently received single versus doublet chemotherapy