Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 22;60(3):244–258. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12980

Table 1.

Effect size analysis of RCT studies examining the efficacy of MBIs

k Number of effect sizes Total n Intervention effects z p Heterogeneity Publication bias (Eggers)
Mean effect size (d) SE 95% CI Q value p I 2 (%) t p
All measures 33 239 3,666 0.19 0.02 [.14 to .23] 8.65 <.01 790.07 <.01 69.75 4.37 <.01
Mindfulness 11 27 1,475 0.24 0.12 [.01 to .46] 2.06 .04 42.28 <.01 76.35 0.49 .64
Social behaviour 10 25 1,247 0.16 0.11 [−.05 to .37] 1.53 .13 30.95 <.01 67.69 0.83 .43
Negative behaviour 11 20 970 0.27 0.10 [.07 to .47] 2.60 <.01 21.00 .02 52.38 2.62 <.05
Depression 13 20 1,529 0.27 0.11 [.06 to .49] 2.53 <.01 44.36 <.01 72.95 2.85 <.05
Anxiety/Stress 20 41 2,319 0.16 0.06 [.04 to .27] 2.59 .01 40.21 <.01 47.78 2.19 <.05
Executive functions 15 25 1,691 0.30 0.09 [.12 to .49] 3.28 <.01 47.86 <.01 68.66 1.09 .30
Attention 8 8 1,158 0.19 0.08 [.04 to .34] 2.44 .02 10.78 .15 35.05 0.82 .42