Skip to main content
. 2019 May 22;10:643. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00643

Table 2.

Effect of climatic and edaphic conditions on interior Douglas-fir ectomycorrhizal fungal species community composition across five regions assessed by (A) PERMANOVA and (B) assessed by multivariate generalized linear model. Effect of climatic and edaphic conditions on (C) exploration types assessed by PERMANOVA.

(A) Ectomycorrhizal fungal community composition, PERMANOVA model
Abiotic factors Df Pseudo F Pseudo R2 P-value
MAPa 1 2.38 0.03 <0.01
MATb 1 2.94 0.04 <0.01
soil C:Nc 1 2.48 0.03 <0.01
pH 1 1.79 0.02 0.02
Residuals 69 0.88
Total 73 1.00

(B) Ectomycorrhizal fungal community composition, multivariategeneralized model

Abiotic factors Res.Df Df.diff Deviance P-value

(Intercept) 61
MAP 59 1 121.37 0.01
MAT 60 1 61.90 0.01
Soil C:N 58 1 98.22 0.04
pH 57 1 102.44 0.05

(C) Ectomycorrhizal fungal exploration type, PERMANOVA model

Abiotic factors Df Pseudo F Pseudo R2 P-value

MAP 1 5.4 0.07 <0.01
MAT 1 4.5 0.05 <0.01
soil C:N 1 3.94 0.05 0.01
Residuals 69 0.83
Total 72 1.00

Significant P-values (<0.05) are shown in bold. A negative binomial distribution was assumed for the multivariate model and explained deviance was tested after 999 permutations. aMAP, mean annual precipitation; bMAT, mean annual temperature; csoil C:N, soil carbon-to-nitrogen ratio.