Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Dec 5;44(1):22–30. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12641

Table 1.

HbA1c trajectory group by demographic, HbA1c and periodontal variables. Percentages or standard deviation in parentheses. N = 799

HbA1c trajectory group
Low (N=85) Medium (N=436) High (N=278)

Demographic characteristics
 Male (N=408, 51.1%) 40 (47.1) 202 (46.3) 166 (59.7)a
 Low SES at 26 (N=196, 24.5%)1 17 (20.2) 93 (22.7) 86 (32.0)b
 Low SES at 32 (N=230, 28.8%) 18 (21.2) 130 (29.8) 92 (29.5)
 Low SES at 38 (N=146, 18.3%)2 5 (5.9) 72 (16.6) 69 (24.9)c
HbA1c measures
 Mean HbA1c at 26 IFCC (SD)3 [NGSP % units]* 25.9 (1.9) [4.5%] 29.9 (2.1) [4.9%] 33.4 (2.2) [5.2%]d
 Mean HbA1c at 32 IFCC (SD)4 [NGSP % units]* 28.5 (2.2) [4.8%] 33.2 (2.1) [5.2%] 36.6 (2.2) [5.5%]d
 Mean HbA1c at 38 IFCC (SD)5 [NGSP % units]* 29.6 (2.1) [4.9%] 34.1 (2.3) [5.3%] 38.8 (2.7) [5.7%]d
Periodontitis prevalence
 1+ sites with 4+mm AL at 26 (N=141, 17.6%) 8 (9.4) 73 (16.7) 60 (21.6)b
 1+ sites with 4+mm AL at 32 (N=165, 20.7%) 10 (11.8) 84 (19.3) 71 (25.5)b
 1+ sites with 4+mm AL at 38 (N=271, 33.9%) 23 (27.1) 148 (33.9) 100 (36.0)
 2+ sites with 4+mm AL at 26 (N=57, 7.1%) 1 (1.2) 29 (6.7) 27 (9.7)b
 2+ sites with 4+mm AL at 32 (N=98, 12.3%) 5 (5.9) 50 (11.5) 43 (15.5)b
 2+ sites with 4+mm AL at 38 (N=177, 22.2%) 13 (15.3) 92 (21.1) 72 (25.9)
Anthropometric characteristics
 Mean waist-height ratio at 26 (SD)6 0.46 (0.04) 0.46 (0.05) 0.47 (0.06)
 Mean waist-height ratio at 32 (SD)7 0.48 (0.05) 0.48 (0.06) 0.50 (0.07)e
 Mean waist-height ratio at 38 (SD)8 0.49 (0.05) 0.50 (0.07) 0.51 (0.08)e
 High waist-height group at 26 (N=167, 21.7%)6 11 (13.4) 79 (18.7) 77 (28.8)a
 High waist-height group at 32 (N=291, 37.5%)7 26 (32.1) 150 (35.3) 115 (42.6)
 High waist-height group at 38 (N=354, 44.8%)8 34 (40.0) 179 (41.6) 141 (51.1)b
Smoking
 Smoker at 26 (N=304, 38.0%) 17 (20.0) 162 (37.2) 125 (45.0)a
 Smoker at 32 (N=252, 31.5%) 15 (17.6) 133 (30.5) 104 (37.4)a
 Smoker at 38 (N=200, 25.1%)9 7 (8.2) 102 (23.4) 91 (32.9)a
a

p<0.005; chi-square test.

b

p<0.05; chi-square test.

c

p<0.001; chi-square test

d

p<0.001; Kruskal–Wallis test.

e

p<0.05; Kruskal–Wallis test.

*

It was not possible to convert very small HbA1c values (such as standard deviations) from IFCC to valid NGSP values.

1

N=762.

2

N=797.

3

N=732.

4

N=759.

5

N=779.

6

N=771.

7

N=776.

8

N=791.

9

N=798