Skip to main content
. 2019 May 30;137(7):825–832. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1230

Table 3. Cross-sectional and Prospective Associations Between Perceived Discrimination and Emotional Well-being Outcomes Among Participants Reporting Poor Eyesight (in Ratings of Overall Eyesight)a.

Emotional Well-being Outcome Cross-sectional Prospective
No Perceived Discrimination (n = 444) Perceived Discrimination (n = 469) P Value No Perceived Discrimination (n = 247) Perceived Discrimination (n = 316) P Value
Depressive symptoms above threshold
Mean (SE), % 22.6 (2.0) 36.2 (1.9) <.001 20.4 (2.6) 31.2 (2.2) .02
OR (95% CI) 1 [Reference] 2.14 (1.57 to 2.92) 1 [Reference] 1.72 (1.08 to 2.76)
Quality of life
Mean score (SE) 37.46 (0.43) 33.58 (0.41) <.001 36.76 (0.51) 36.17 (0.42) .88
B (95% CI) 1 [Reference] −4.06 (−5.29 to −2.84) 1 [Reference] −0.11 (−1.56 to 1.35)
Life satisfaction
Mean score (SE) 19.21 (0.32) 16.95 (0.31) <.001 18.64 (0.38) 18.20 (0.32) .32
B (95% CI) 1 [Reference] −2.37 (−3.28 to −1.46) 1 [Reference] −0.53 (−1.57 to 0.52)
High loneliness
Mean (SE), % 27.0 (2.1) 41.2 (2.0) <.001 27.8 (2.8) 33.6 (2.4) .23
OR (95% CI) 1 [Reference] 2.17 (1.61 to 2.92) 1 [Reference] 1.38 (0.82 to 2.34)

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

a

All figures are weighted for sampling probabilities and differential nonresponse and adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and wealth. Prospective figures are additionally adjusted for baseline status or score. Possible scores range from 0 to 57 for quality of life and 0 to 30 for life satisfaction.