Table 2.
Strain | Accession | Genome size (bp) | Status | Attomoles in Mix-51-staggereda |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alistipes indistinctus YIT 12060 | GCA_000231275.1 | 2 855 429 | Draft | 4 |
Bacteroides cellulosilyticus DSM 14838 | GCA_000158035.1 | 6 870 144 | Draft | 200 |
Bacteroides finegoldii DSM 17565 | GCA_000156195.1 | 4 892 401 | Draft | 20 |
Bacteroides intestinalis DSM 17393 | GCA_000172175.1 | 2 642 081 | Draft | 120 |
Bacteroides ovatus ATCC 8483 | NZ_CP012938.1 | 6 465 369 | Complete | 60 |
Bacteroides plebeius DSM 17135 | GCA_000187895.1 | 4 421 924 | Draft | 80 |
Bacteroides stercoris ATCC 43183 | GCA_000154525.1 | 4 009 829 | Draft | 240 |
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron 3731 | 7 187 176 | Complete | 160 | |
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron 7330 | GCA_001314975.1 | 6 487 685 | Complete | 320 |
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 | GCA_000011065.1 | 6 293 399 | Complete | 40 |
Bacteroides uniformis ATCC 8492 | GCA_000154205.1 | 4 719 097 | Draft | 280 |
Bacteroides vulgatus ATCC 8482 | GCA_000012825.1 | 5 163 189 | Complete | 400 |
Bacteroidetes dorei DSM 17855 | GCA_000156075.1 | 5 566 217 | Draft | 4 |
Bifidobacterium adolescentis L2-32 | GCA_000154085.1 | 2 389 110 | Draft | 4 |
Bifidobacterium angulatum DSM 20098 | NZ_AP012322.1 | 2 008 208 | Complete | 60 |
Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC 29521 | NZ_AP012323.1 | 2 201 251 | Complete | 80 |
Bifidobacterium dentium ATCC 27678 | GCA_000172135.1 | 2 642 081 | Draft | 40 |
Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum DSM 20438 | GCA_000173435.1 | 2 304 808 | Draft | 20 |
Blautia hansenii DSM 20583 | NZ_CP022413.2 | 3 058 721 | Complete | 8 |
Blautia luti DSM 14534 | 4 068 430 | Complete | 32 | |
Citrobacter youngae ATCC 29220 | GCA_000155975.1 | 5 154 159 | Draft | 64 |
Clostridium asparagiforme DSM 15981 | GCA_000158075.1 | 6 417 332 | Draft | 64 |
Clostridium bolteae ATCC BAA-613 | NZ_CP022464.2/NZ_CP022465.2 | 6 557 988 | Complete | 8 |
Clostridium hathewayi DSM 13479 | GCA_000160095.1 | 7 163 884 | Draft | 32 |
Clostridium hylemonae DSM 15053 | GCA_000156515.1 | 3 889 859 | Draft | 16 |
Clostridium ramosum DSM 1402 | GCA_000154485.1 | 3 235 195 | Draft | 16 |
Clostridium sp. M62/1 | GCA_000159055.1 | 3 842 594 | Draft | 64 |
Clostridium sporogenes ATCC 15579 | GCA_000155085.1 | 4 102 325 | Draft | 8 |
Clostridium symbiosum ATCC 14940 | GCA_000466485.1 | 4 823 675 | Draft | 32 |
Collinsella intestinalis DSM 13280 | GCA_000156175.1 | 1 809 497 | Draft | 16 |
Collinsella stercoris DSM 13279 | GCA_000156215.1 | 2 475 429 | Draft | 16 |
Coprococcus comes ATCC 27758 | GCA_000155875.1 | 3 242 215 | Draft | 8 |
Dorea formicigenerans ATCC 27755 | GCA_000169235.1 | 3 186 031 | Draft | 32 |
Edwardsiella tarda ATCC 23685 | GCA_000163955.1 | 3 744 568 | Draft | 8 |
Enterobacter cancerogenus ATCC 35316 | GCA_000155995.1 | 4 638 653 | Draft | 4 |
Escherichia fergusonii ATCC 35469 | GCA_000026225.1 | 4 643 861 | Complete | 16 |
Eubacterium biforme DSM 3989 | GCA_000156655.1 | 2 517 763 | Draft | 4 |
Eubacterium eligens ATCC 27750 | GCA_000146185.1 | 2 831 389 | Complete | 16 |
Holdemania filiformis DSM 12042 | GCA_000157995.1 | 3 932 923 | Draft | 4 |
Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 20016 | GCA_000016825.1 | 1 999 618 | Complete | 4 |
Lactobacillus ruminis DSM 20403 | GCA_001436475.1 | 2 008 484 | Draft | 32 |
Marvinbryantia formatexigens DSM 14469 | GCA_000173815.1 | 4 548 960 | Draft | 64 |
Megamonas funiformis YIT 11815 | GCA_000245775.1 | 2 562 512 | Draft | 4 |
Parabacteroides johnsonii DSM 18315 | GCA_000156495.1 | 4 787 097 | Draft | 80 |
Parabacteroides merdae ATCC 43184 | GCA_000154105.1 | 4 434 377 | Draft | 40 |
Proteus penneri ATCC 35198 | GCA_000155835.1 | 3 749 229 | Draft | 8 |
Roseburia intestinalis L1-82 | GCA_000156535.1 | 4 411 375 | Draft | 64 |
Ruminococcus gnavus ATCC 29149 | GCA_000169475.1 | 3 501 911 | Draft | 8 |
Streptococcus infantarius ATCC BAA-102 | GCA_000154985.1 | 1 925 187 | Draft | 64 |
Subdoligranulum variabile DSM 15176 | GCA_000157955.1 | 3 245 471 | Draft | 16 |
Tyzzerella nexilis DSM 1787 | GCA_000156035.2 | 3 995 628 | Draft | 4 |
aBased on the assumption that draft-quality genomes represent the true genome size. As discussed in the main text, under ‘Performance in synthetic metagenomes with highly similar strains’, coverages in the resulting assembled metagenomes suggested that calculated molar quantities of draft genomes were inaccurate due to uncertainty in the genome sizes.