Table 2.
Intervention exposure and contamination
| Number (%) of mothers in intervention villages at endline (‘exposure’) n = 1254 | Number (%) of mothers in control villages at endline (‘contamination’) n = 1237 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mother reports that there are active programs promoting institutional delivery in her area and: | ||
| There are any programs that give money to a mother if she delivers in a public health centreb | 285/1228a (23.2%) | 95/1189a (8.0%) |
| The programs give money to a mother for transportation to a health centre for delivery | 231/1228 (18.8%) | 97/1189 (8.2%) |
| The programs give money to CHWs if mothers deliver in a health centre | 130/1228 (10.6%) | 51/1189 (4.3%) |
| The programs provide information about the importance of delivering a baby in a health centre | 95/1228 (7.7%) | 159/1189 (13.4%) |
| The programs provide transportation to a health centre | 380/1228 (30.9%) | 194/1189 (16.3%) |
| Mother reported that she knew she would receive our CCT incentive if she delivered in a health facilityb | 118/1254 (9.4%) | 119/1237 (9.6%) |
| Composite measure of CCT program exposurec | 342/1254 (27.3%) | 195/1237 (15.8%) |
CCT conditional cash transfer
a 26 women in intervention villages and 48 women in control villages reported they “did not know” and were excluded
b Included in the composite measure
c Mother reported that she knew (i) there were programs that would give her money if she delivered in a health facility or (ii) she would receive our conditional cash transfer (CCT) incentive if she delivered in a health facility