Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;10:2423. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10144-w

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

RNASeq analysis of GL7+ and GL7 antigen-specific Peyer’s patch (PP) B cells. a GFP+ antigen-specific B cells were sorted into GL7+ or GL7 populations on day ten following an oral immunization with NP-CT and their gene expression profiles were analyzed using RNAseq. Concomitantly GL7 (naïve) and GL7+ B cells from PP and GL7 B cells from the spleen of unimmunized control mice were sorted for a comparative analysis of gene expression profiles. A principle component analysis of RNAseq data demonstrated global gene expression similarities between GL7+ and GL7 GFP+ B cells that were distinctly different from GFP naïve splenic or PP B cells, but similar to endogenous activated GFP GL7+ GC B cells. b Venn diagrams comparing gene expression changes between groups. In the upper panel, naïve GL7 (n = 3 samples), activated PP GFP+GL7 (n = 3) and activated GFP+/−GL7+ PP (n = 4) PP B cells were compared to GL7 naïve splenic B cells (n = 3), and in the lower panel activated PP GFP+GL7 (n = 3), GFP+GL7+ PP (n = 2) and GFPGL7+ PP (n = 2) were compared to naïve GL7 PP B cells (n = 3). Genes with a fold change > 1.5 and FDR adjusted p-value < 0.05 were counted, and the figures in each Venn field indicate the number of shared genes between groups. c Heat map of global gene expression in the PP B cell subpopulations compared to that of sorted naïve splenic B cells. d Heat map depicting the mRNA expression of selected genes in different B cell subpopulations, demonstrating differences between GL7+ and GL7 NP-specific GFP+ B cells with regard to gene expression signatures associated with migratory cues but similarities in expression of GC genes. Differences in gene expression are indicated the same in c and d with the scale at the bottom being applicable to both