Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 4;51(6):63. doi: 10.1038/s12276-019-0255-x

Table 3.

PF-related parameters in rats after modeling

Group Lung weight (g) Lung coefficient (g/g) HYP content (mg/g) Alveolar inflammation PF degree
Sham group 1.39 ± 0.14 0.31 ± 0.03 1.18 ± 0.12 1.04 ± 0.11 1.28 ± 0.12
3 d 2.54 ± 0.21* 0.97 ± 0.1* 1.68 ± 0.15* 2.02 ± 0.18* 2.36 ± 0.16*
PF group 14 d 2.49 ± 0.24* 1.22 ± 0.11* 2.29 ± 0.23* 3.11 ± 0.28* 2.59 ± 0.26*
28 d 2.59 ± 0.23* 0.86 ± 0.09* 2.64 ± 0.21* 2.94 ± 0.30* 3.16 ± 0.31*

PF pulmonary fibrosis, and HYP hydroxyproline. All results were measurement data and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation; * p< 0.05, vs. the sham group; the sham group, n = 18; and the model group, n = 18