Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 3;10(7):1633–1641. doi: 10.7150/jca.26935

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of DBC1 overexpression classified by clinicopathological parameters

Study covariates Studies (patients) OR (95% CI) I2 (%) Ph Z P Model
Gender (Female/Male) 9(2391) 0.878(0.723-1.066) 0.0 0.565 1.32 0.188 fixed
Age (<60/≥60) 5(1121) 0.596 (0.467-0.761) 3.5 0.387 4.14 <0.001 fixed
WHO classification (Tubular/Others) 2(373) 3.780(2.303-6.205) 0.0 0.348 5.26 <0.001 fixed
Lauren classification (Intestinal/Diffuse) 3(770) 2.000(1.492-2.680) 0.0 0.768 4.64 <0.001 fixed
LN metastasis (Absence/Presence) 5(1064) 0.405(0.203-0.806) 85.6 <0.001 2.57 0.010 random
Distant metastasis (Absence/Presence) 4(1270) 1.421(0.885-2.282) 0.0 0.755 1.45 0.146 fixed
Tumor size (≤5/>5cm) 2(321) 0.698(0.153-3.184) 85.3 0.009 0.46 0.642 random
TNM stage (1-2/3-4) 9(2391) 0.737(0.474-1.147) 87.1 <0.001 1.56 0.119 random
Tumor invasion (Early cancer/Advanced cancer) 3(713) 0.488(0.195-1.222) 83.8 0.002 1.53 0.126 random
Venous invasion (Absence/Presence) 3(921) 0.590(0.188-1.848) 84.8 0.001 0.91 0.365 random
Histologic grade (well+ moderately differentiated/ poorly differentiated) 8(2192) 0.854(0.511-1.429) 76.2 <0.001 0.60 0.548 random

LN lymph node; OR odds ratio; CI confidence intervals; Ph P-value for heterogeneity based on Q test; P P-value for statistical significance based on Z test.