Rieder 1987.
Methods | Randomised, controlled Method of randomisation: draw system with sealed envelopes Type of shunt: ventriculoperitoneal shunts Location: London Follow‐up: 3 months Duration: 36 months |
|
Participants | Inclusion: all children who presented for elective VP shunt insertion Exclusion: active infection or history of shunt infections. Immunosuppressed or receiving corticosteroid therapy. Allergy to penicillin or cephalothin Treatment: 32; control: 31 |
|
Interventions | 25 mg/kg cephalothin IV before incision and 3 times postoperatively every 6 hours versus multivitamin preparation administration | |
Outcomes | Proportion of participants who had shunt infection No clear timing of outcome measurement described |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "Envelope draw system" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "Pharmacist not otherwise involved in the patient's care" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The administered multivitamin sample in the control group has the same colour and is administered according to the same schedule as the cephalothin |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No apparent missing outcome data and dropouts described |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Pre‐specified outcome measures were unavailable |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias |