Wang 1984.
Methods | Randomised, controlled Method of randomisation: a table of random numbers Type of shunt: ventriculoperitoneal shunts Location: Canada Follow‐up: "until the last patient contact" Duration: 20 months |
|
Participants | Inclusion: all patients that underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery at their hospital Exclusion: VPS infection within the preceding month. Received antibiotics within the previous week or patients who were known to be allergic to the intervention drug Treatment: 55; control: 65 |
|
Interventions | 5 mg/kg trimethoprim and 25 mg/kg sulphamethoxazole IV. The first dose 1 hour before surgery. The second and third dose were given 8 and 16 hours after surgery. Control: dextrose solution given at the same time slot | |
Outcomes | Proportion of participants who had shunt infection Mean days after surgery before onset of infection in the trimethoprim group was 24.5 days and 47 days in the sulphamethoxazole group |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "table of random numbers" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "double blinded" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 7 exclusions due to infection diagnosed perioperatively. Exclusions well defined |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol is not available but it is clear that the published report includes all expected outcomes |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias |
IV = intravenous