Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 1;17(16):1–86.

Table A2:

Applicability of Included Studies in the Economic Literature Review

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of SCIG versus IVIG treatment
Author, year Is the study population similar to the question? Are the interventions similar to the question? Is the health care system in which the study was conducted sufficiently similar to the current Ontario context? Was the perspective clearly stated and what was it? Are estimates of relative treatment effect from the best available source?
Gerth et al,201411 Yes Yes Yes (Canada) Yes; Public payer Not applicable
Martin et al,201334 Yes Yes Yes (Canada) Yes; Public payer Not applicable
CADTH, 200835 (First analysis)a Yes Yes Yes (Canada) Yes; Public payer Not applicable
CADTH, 2008 (Second analysis)b Yes Yes Yes (Canada) Yes; Public payer Partly
Beauteet al200936 (First analysis)a Yes Yes Yes (France) Yes; Public payer Not applicable
Beauteet al 200936 (Second analysis)c Yes Yes Yes (France) Yes; Public payer Not applicable
Author, year Are all future costs and outcomes discounted? (If yes, at what rate?) Is the value of health effects expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years? Are costs from other sectors fully and appropriately measured and valued? Overall judgement (directly applicable/partially applicable/not applicable)
Gerth et al, 201411 Not applicable Not applicable Partly Partially Applicable
Martin et al, 201334 No Not applicable Partly Partially Applicable
CADTH, 200835 (First analysis)a Not applicable Not applicable Partly Partially Applicable
CADTH, 2008 (Second analysis)b Not applicable Yes Partly Partially Applicable
Beauteet al 200936 (First analysis)a Not applicable Not applicable Partly Not Applicable
Beauteet al 200936 (Second analysis)c Not applicable Not applicable No Not Applicable

Abbreviations: IVIG, hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin; SCIG, home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin.

a

In the first analysis, authors assumed that SCIG and IVIG would yield identical clinical outcomes, and then conducted the cost minimization analysis.

b

In the second analysis, authors assumed that SCIG and IVIG would yield different clinical outcomes, and then conducted the cost utility analysis.

c

Authors included eight patients with SCIG therapy and 26 patients with IVIG therapy. The crude results were reported.