Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2019 Jul;30(4):553–560. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001016

Table 3.

Marginal difference in the expected prevalence of reporting at least one unmet need with activities or independent activities of daily living for Mexican adults ≥ 50 years old with at least one adult migrant child versus no migrant children

Women (n=1208)
Marginal RD 95% CI
2001 0.04 (−0.02, 0.10)
2003 0.13 (0.04, 0.21)a
2012 0.07 (−0.02, 0.15)

Men (n=1225)
Marginal RD 95% CI
2001 0.00 (−0.05, 0.06)
2003 −0.02 (−0.11, 0.07)
2012 0.08 (0.00, 0.16)b

Source: Mexican Health and Aging Study, 2001 – 2012. Note: Analyses restricted to respondents who reported > 1 ADL/IADL in a given wave

Notes:

a.

e-value, or minimum strength of association that an unmeasured confounder would have to have between treatment and outcome (on the risk ratio scale) necessary to reduce observed risk differences to the null (assuming that those associations are of identical size) = 1.68 (lower bound of 95% CI: 1.33)

b.

e-value: 1.56 (lower bound: 1.42).