Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 17;176(1):27–36. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05233-9

Table 2.

Overview of results of the included articles studying oestrogen receptor (ER) load in 26,259 patients

References Level of evidence and design Number of patients Outcome measure Median FU (years) Significant association
Bartlett 2011 [18] 2b, RCT 4325 DFS 5 Yes
Esslimani-Sahla 2004 [23] 3b, case–control 50 Recurrence 5 Yes
Dowsett 2008 [22] 1b, RCT 1856 DFS 5.7 Marginally
Ma 2013 [26] 3b, case–control 1206 BCSS 10 Marginally
Ryu 2018 [30] 3b, cohort 4948 OS 4.8 Marginally
Campbell 2016 [19] 2b, cohort 503 DFS 5.7 No
Chae 2011 [20] 2c, cohort 171 DFS 4.3 No
Chapman 2013 [21] 1b, RCT 345 DFS 9.7 No
Harigopal 2010 [24] 2b, RCT 1715 DFS 7.2 No
Hill 2017 [25] 3b, case–control 1098 OS 7.8 No
Mazouni 2010 [27] 1b, cohort 797 OS 6.3 No
Morgan 2011 [28] 3b, cohort 563 OS 10 No
Prabhu 2014 [17] 2b, cohort 231 DFS 2.4 No
Prat 2013 [29] 4, cohort 701 DRFS 12.5 No
Regierer 2011 [11] 2b, cohort 3971 RFS 5 No
Turbin 2008 [31] 2b, cohort 3484 BCSS 12.5 No
Zhang 2014 [32] 3b, cohort 295 OS 5 No

In case of statistically significant associations, a higher ER load is associated with better clinical outcome. Level of evidence, according to the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine [18]

FU Follow-up, DFS Disease-free survival, BCSS Breast cancer-specific survival, OS Overall survival, DRFS Distant recurrence-free survival, RFS Recurrence-free survival