Table 2.
Reference | Sample | Caffeine dose | Performance metric | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Astorino et al. [97] | 8 endurance-trained and 8 ‘active’ young men | 5 mg/kg | 10-km cycling time trial | Caffeine ingestion reduced the time necessary to complete 10-km of cycling in endurance-trained but not in ‘active’ men |
Boyett et al.a [83] | 7 endurance-trained and 7 untrained young men | 6 mg/kg | Isokinetic knee extension and 3-km cycling time trial | For cycling time trial, the differences in responses to caffeine and placebo ingestion in the morning training sessions were ‘unclear’ between the groups; for the two evening conditions, following caffeine ingestion, untrained individuals ‘likely’ experienced greater reductions in time necessary to complete 3-km of cycling than trained individuals; for isokinetic peak torque, the comparisons were either ‘trivial’ or ‘unclear’ |
Brooks et al. [109] | 7 resistance-trained and 7 untrained young men | 5 mg/kg | Weight lifted and force produced in the 1 RM Smith machine squat | Caffeine ingestion improved 1 RM weight lifted in untrained but not in resistance-trained men; no between-group differences were observed for force production |
Collomp et al. [24] | 7 trained swimmers and 7 untrained swimmers (young men and women) | 250 mg | 1600-m swimming for the trained swimmers and 400-m for the untrained | Caffeine ingestion improved swimming velocity in trained but not in untrained participants |
O’Rourke et al. [108] | 15 young well-trained and 15 recreational runners (sex was not specified) | 5 mg/kg | 5-km running time trial | Caffeine ingestion reduced time necessary to complete 5-km of running in both well-trained and recreational runners |
Porterfield et al. [107] | 10 endurance-trained and 10 untrained young men | 5 mg/kg | Cycling time to exhaustion | Caffeine ingestion did not improve time to exhaustion either in endurance-trained or untrained men |
1 RM 1 repetition maximum
aData were analyzed using the magnitude based inferences approach