Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 11;122(5):671–681. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.022

Table 2.

Exposure status and factor scores derived from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Values are the estimate (95% CI) of the difference from unexposed for all subjects (n=997). *P-values include the two degree-of-freedom P-value comparing across all exposure groups (significance indicated by P<0.05) and pairwise comparisons of single or multiple exposures vs no exposure; significance of pairwise comparisons indicated in bold for P<0.025 (Bonferroni correction). The analysis used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for imbalances across exposure categories amongst children actually tested. A separate model was fit for each factor score. The reference group for anaesthesia exposure was no exposure. CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; CI, confidence interval; EFA, exploratory factor analysis.

Characteristic Factor 1
Factor 2
Factor 3
Factor 4
Factor 5
Mean (95% CI) P-value* Mean (95% CI) P-value* Mean (95% CI) P-value* Mean (95% CI) P-value* Mean (95% CI) P-value*
EFA <0.001 0.407 0.962 0.729 0.063
 Unexposed Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Single –0.08 (–0.26, 0.10) 0.40 0.13 (–0.06, 0.31) 0.18 0.01 (–0.22, 0.25) 0.91 –0.02 (–0.23, 0.19) 0.87 0.10 (–0.08, 0.28) 0.29
 Multiple –0.41 (–0.62, –0.19) <0.001 0.04 (–0.14, 0.23) 0.64 –0.02 (–0.23, 0.19) 0.86 –0.07 (–0.24, 0.11) 0.44 –0.14 (–0.35, 0.06) 0.16
CFA 0.005 0.187 0.882 0.834 0.032
 Unexposed Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Single –0.05 (–0.23, 0.14) 0.63 0.09 (–0.09, 0.28) 0.33 –0.01 (–0.24, 0.23) 0.95 –0.00 (–0.22, 0.22) 0.99 0.12 (–0.06, 0.29) 0.20
 Multiple –0.35 (–0.57, –0.13) 0.002 –0.10 (–0.29, 0.10) 0.32 0.04 (–0.16, 0.24) 0.67 0.05 (–0.13, 0.23) 0.59 –0.14 (–0.34, 0.05) 0.14