Table 2.
Exposure status and factor scores derived from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Values are the estimate (95% CI) of the difference from unexposed for all subjects (n=997). *P-values include the two degree-of-freedom P-value comparing across all exposure groups (significance indicated by P<0.05) and pairwise comparisons of single or multiple exposures vs no exposure; significance of pairwise comparisons indicated in bold for P<0.025 (Bonferroni correction). The analysis used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for imbalances across exposure categories amongst children actually tested. A separate model was fit for each factor score. The reference group for anaesthesia exposure was no exposure. CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; CI, confidence interval; EFA, exploratory factor analysis.
Characteristic | Factor 1 |
Factor 2 |
Factor 3 |
Factor 4 |
Factor 5 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (95% CI) | P-value* | Mean (95% CI) | P-value* | Mean (95% CI) | P-value* | Mean (95% CI) | P-value* | Mean (95% CI) | P-value* | |
EFA | <0.001 | 0.407 | 0.962 | 0.729 | 0.063 | |||||
Unexposed | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
Single | –0.08 (–0.26, 0.10) | 0.40 | 0.13 (–0.06, 0.31) | 0.18 | 0.01 (–0.22, 0.25) | 0.91 | –0.02 (–0.23, 0.19) | 0.87 | 0.10 (–0.08, 0.28) | 0.29 |
Multiple | –0.41 (–0.62, –0.19) | <0.001 | 0.04 (–0.14, 0.23) | 0.64 | –0.02 (–0.23, 0.19) | 0.86 | –0.07 (–0.24, 0.11) | 0.44 | –0.14 (–0.35, 0.06) | 0.16 |
CFA | 0.005 | 0.187 | 0.882 | 0.834 | 0.032 | |||||
Unexposed | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||||
Single | –0.05 (–0.23, 0.14) | 0.63 | 0.09 (–0.09, 0.28) | 0.33 | –0.01 (–0.24, 0.23) | 0.95 | –0.00 (–0.22, 0.22) | 0.99 | 0.12 (–0.06, 0.29) | 0.20 |
Multiple | –0.35 (–0.57, –0.13) | 0.002 | –0.10 (–0.29, 0.10) | 0.32 | 0.04 (–0.16, 0.24) | 0.67 | 0.05 (–0.13, 0.23) | 0.59 | –0.14 (–0.34, 0.05) | 0.14 |