Table 2.
One-way ANOVA results comparing average numbers of cockroaches trapped in field studies at two locations from May to November.
| Location | Apartment categorya | Treatment | F(df) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indianapolis | i | Single AI Treatment | 3.83(6,28) | 0.007 |
| Mixture Treatment | 1.09(6,28) | 0.4 | ||
| Rotation Treatment | 2.66(6,21) | 0.04 | ||
| iii | All treatments | 0.73(12,104)b | 0.72 | |
| Danville | i | Single AI Treatment | 0.50(6,28) | 0.8 |
| Mixture Treatment | 1.24(6,21) | 0.33 | ||
| Rotation Treatment | 0.81(6,34) | 0.57 | ||
| ii | Single AI Treatment | 0.97(6,21) | 0.47 | |
| Mixture Treatment | 0.70(6,41) | 0.65 | ||
| Rotation Treatment | 0.49(6,21) | 0.81 | ||
| iii | All treatments | 1.17(12,242)b | 0.31 |
aCategories based on starting trap catches: “i” Average Trap Catch (ATC) >0 to <6, “ii” ATC >6 and “iii” adjacent apartments with starting ATC = 0.
bFactorial ANOVA: interaction effect between treatment and time.