Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 5;365:l1842. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1842

Table 4.

Results for number of women with improvement of stress urinary incontinence symptoms

Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Direct evidence Network meta-analysis GRADE quality of evidence
No of trials Odds ratio (95% CI) Odds ratio (95% Crl)
Transobturator MUS Retropubic MUS 40* 0.86 (0.70 to 1.06) 0.76 (0.59 to 0.98) Moderate
Open colposuspension Retropubic MUS 6* 0.83 (0.55 to 1.24) 0.65 (0.41 to 1.02) Low
Laparoscopic colposuspension Retropubic MUS 4 0.49 (0.18 to 1.35) 0.52 (0.29 to 0.91) Low
Traditional sling Retropubic MUS 6* 0.62 (0.38 to 1.02) 0.69 (0.39 to 1.26) Low
Single incision Retropubic MUS 6* 0.42 (0.20 to 0.89) 0.50 (0.35 to 0.71) Moderate
Bladder neck needle suspension Retropubic MUS 0.25 (0.11 to 0.58) Low
Anterior repair Retropubic MUS 0.18 (0.08 to 0.39) Very low
Pelvic floor muscle training Retropubic MUS 0.43 (0.14 to 1.37) Low
Open colposuspension Transobturator MUS 1 0.90 (0.30 to 2.69) 0.85 (0.52 to 1.41) Low
Laparoscopic colpo Transobturator MUS 0.69 (0.37 to 1.26) Low
Traditional sling Transobturator MUS 1 2.00 (0.17 to 23.96) 0.91 (0.49 to 1.72) Very low
Single incision Transobturator MUS 28* 0.74 (0.57 to 0.96) 0.66 (0.49 to 0.89) Moderate
Bladder neck needle suspension Transobturator MUS 0.33 (0.14 to 0.79) Very low
Anterior repair Transobturator MUS 1 1.00 (0.26 to 3.89) 0.24 (0.10 to 0.53) Very low
Pelvic floor muscle training Transobturator MUS 1 0.18 (0.10 to 0.33) 0.56 (0.19 to 1.78) Low
Laparoscopic colposuspension Open colposuspension 9 0.93 (0.58 to 1.48) 0.81 (0.49 to 1.31) Low
Traditional sling Open colposuspension 3* 2.47 (0.73 to 8.40) 1.07 (0.54 to 2.15) Low
Single incision Open colposuspension 0.78 (0.44 to 1.36) Low
Bladder neck needle suspension Open colposuspension 3* 0.38 (0.22 to 0.63) 0.38 (0.18 to 0.81) Low
Anterior repair Open colposuspension 3* 0.20 (0.07 to 0.60) 0.28 (0.14 to 0.55) Very low
Pelvic floor muscle training Open colposuspension 1 8.87 (1.66 to 47.25) 0.66 (0.21 to 2.16) Low
Traditional sling Laparoscopic colposuspension 1.32 (0.62 to 2.98) Low
Single incision Laparoscopic colposuspension 0.97 (0.50 to 1.87) Low
Bladder neck needle suspension Laparoscopic colposuspension 0.47 (0.20 to 1.17) Very low
Anterior repair Laparoscopic colposuspension 0.34 (0.15 to 0.79) Very low
Pelvic floor muscle training Laparoscopic colposuspension 0.82 (0.25 to 2.88) Very low
Single incision Traditional sling 1 1.92 (0.65 to 5.64) 0.73 (0.37 to 1.39) Low
Bladder neck needle suspension Traditional sling 1 1.00 (0.05 to 18.57) 0.36 (0.13 to 0.95) Very low
Anterior repair Traditional sling 0.26 (0.10 to 0.65) Very low
Pelvic floor muscle training Traditional sling 0.62 (0.18 to 2.18) Very low
Bladder neck needle suspension Single incision 0.49 (0.20 to 1.24) Very low
Anterior repair Single incision 0.36 (0.15 to 0.82) Very low
Pelvic floor muscle training Single incision 0.84 (0.28 to 2.78) Low
Anterior repair Bladder neck needle suspension 1* 0.92 (0.55 to 1.55) 0.72 (0.31 to 1.63) Very low
Pelvic floor muscle training Bladder neck needle suspension 1.72 (0.45 to 6.89) Low
Pelvic floor muscle training Anterior repair 2.38 (0.65 to 9.30) Very low

MUS=mid-urethral slings.

*

These analyses are also informed by two three arm trials comparing retropubic MUS, transobturator MUS, and single incision.

An odds ratio >1 favours the first treatment—ie, more events (improvement) occur. An odds ratio <1 favours the second treatment—ie, fewer events.