Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 4;20:305. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2878-2

Table 8.

Time and memory usage for overlap extension and assembly on viral metagenomic data from human plasam

Time (m: minutes, h: hours) Memory (GB)
Mismatch rate 5% 10% 15% 20% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Overlap extension Building index 127m 127m 127m 127m 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4
Recruitment 8m 14m 20m 23m 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
De novo Assembly TAR-VIR 5m 7m 18m 20m 2 2.8 3.5 4
SGA 2m 2m 3m 5m 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
SPAdes 5m 5m 6m 8m 1 1 1 1
SAVAGE 2h 8h 14h 18h 31 45 51 59
Reference-based assembly HaploClique 33h 5
Viquas 72h 4
drVM 23m 1
Extension-based assembly PRICE 1h46m 5

The de novo assembly time and memory usage were evaluated on recruited reads based on mismatch rate from 5% to 20%. HaploClique, Viquas, drVM and PRICE were applied only on recruited reads based on mismatch rate of 15%