Cropsey 2015.
Methods | Setting: community corrections offices, USA Recruitment: smokers under community corrections supervision were recruited via flyers posted at the community corrections offices |
|
Participants | 500 smokers; 33.0% female, average age 37.4; average number of cigarettes smoked per day 17.9 Therapists: counsellors were doctoral or masters level clinical psychologists who had been trained in smoking cessation counselling |
|
Interventions | Pharmacotherapy: NRT; 12 weeks’ supply of bupropion 1. one session of face‐to‐face brief advice 2. four weekly sessions of face‐to‐face brief advice and intensive counselling, each lasting 20 to 30 minutes |
|
Outcomes | Abstinence (carbon monoxide level ≤ 3 ppm) at all study visits (weeks 8, 12 and months 6, 9, 12) Validation: carbon monoxide level (≤ 3 ppm) measured using the Vitalograph Breath Carbone Monoxide monitor |
|
Source of Funding/CoI | The National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Heatlh. No declarations of interest | |
Notes | New for 2019 update Data on the number of abstinent participants received from the authors via email correspondence |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | “randomisation scheme was blocked on race…”. No further details given |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Biochemically validated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Lost to follow‐up rates at 12 months: no counselling arm 25.8%; counselling arm 23.4% |