Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 5;2019(6):CD009670. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009670.pub4

Huber 2003.

Methods Setting: academic research centre, Germany
 Recruitment: community volunteers
Participants 225 smokers (102 in relevant arms); 55% F, av age 38, av cpd 28
Interventions Pharmacotherapy: nicotine gum, 2 or 4 mg
1. 5 x 90‐min weekly meetings. Included contracting, reinforcement, relaxation, skills training
 2. Same schedule of meetings, 45‐min only, focus on sharing experiences
 3. As 1, no nicotine gum. Not included in this review
4. Wait‐list control for 6 m. Not included in this review
Outcomes PP abstinence at 12 m
 Validation: CO ≤ 4 ppm
Source of Funding/CoI Not specified. No declarations of interest
Notes Control and intervention fell into same categories for number and duration of sessions.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, method not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Biochemically validated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 31 people attending 2 or fewer meetings not included in analysis. Said to be evenly distributed. Later dropouts included as smokers; 90% of those receiving therapy (excluded wait‐list group 4, who were also excluded from this review) followed up at 12 m.