Table 2.
Association between social network typologies and dementia
| OR | 95% CI | ||
| Social network type | Family dependent | ref | |
| Locally integrated | 0.34* | (0.15 to 0.79) | |
| Locally self-contained | 1.11 | (0.22 to 5.68) | |
| Wider community focused | No dementia cases | ||
| Private | 1.15 | (0.36 to 3.73) | |
| Non-conclusive | 0.80 | (0.43 to 1.51) | |
| Age group | 60–74 | ref | |
| 75–84 | 3.64* | (1.82 to 7.26) | |
| 85+ | 6.92* | (3.08 to 15.55) | |
| Sex | Female | ref | |
| Male | 1.46 | (0.77 to 2.75) | |
| Ethnicity | Chinese | ref | |
| Malay | 0.74 | (0.43 to 1.26) | |
| Indian | 0.52* | (0.30 to 0.90) | |
| Others | No dementia cases | ||
| Marital status | Married/cohabiting | ref | |
| Never married | 0.57 | (0.11 to 2.79) | |
| Widowed | 1.13 | (0.59 to 2.14) | |
| Divorced/separated | 0.45 | (0.13 to 1.49) | |
| Education | Completed primary | ref | |
| None | 0.81 | (0.37 to 1.75) | |
| Did not complete primary | 0.79 | (0.38 to 1.64) | |
| Completed secondary | 0.36* | (0.14 to 0.88) | |
| Completed tertiary | 0.13* | (0.03 to 0.63) | |
| Income | Yes | ref | |
| No | 3.59* | (1.87 to 6.88) | |
| Physical impairments | Two or below | ref | |
| None | 1.65 | (0.63 to 4.33) | |
| Three or more | 0.90 | (0.51 to 1.57) | |
| Assets | 0.90 | (0.74 to 1.11) | |
| Disability | 1.06* | (1.05 to 1.08) | |
| Constant | 0.03* | (0.01 to 0.18) | |
*Significant given 95% CI does not contain 1.