Skip to main content
. 2019 May 22;6(5):190058. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190058

Table 4.

A comparison of BET surface area and adsorption capacity of adsorbents.

no. adsorbents SBET (m2 g−1) pore volume (cm3 g−1) pore size (Å) qe (mg g−1) ref.
1 MPC 199 0.39 13.9 206.5 this work
2 AC700N2 809 0.55 190.7 [51]
3 commercial AC 800 0.52 160.0 [51]
4 H2O2-modified AC 762 0.55 146.6 [51]
5 SBA-15 737 1.03 80 0.41 [65]
6 cork powder-carbon 891 0.42 7.4 112.4 [72]
7 physically activated cork 1060 0.57 11.2 378.1 [72]
8 physically activated PET 1426 0.584 11.0 266.6 [72]
9 physically activated coal 1156 0.646 14.9 430.4 [72]
10 physically activated wood 899 0.626 10.5 291.9 [72]
11 chemically activated wood 879 0.553 11.4 149.1 [72]
12 CO2-activated carbon 1055 0.733 12.0 178.0 [73]
13 H3PO4-activated carbon 1106 0.560 9.0 312.7 [73]
14 (NH4)2S2O8-activated carbon 903 0.634 159.8 [73]