Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 15;16(7):960–971. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1602438

Table 2.

RNA binding of AUF1 p45 and variants to flaviviral RNA annealing substrates.

  5ʹCS
3ʹCS
Protein KD (nM)a KD ratiob ΔΔG (kJ/mol)c KD (nM)a KD ratiob ΔΔG (kJ/mol)c
AUF1 p45 WT 105 ± 27 1 0 101 ± 30 1 0
AUF1 p45 RGG5K 208 ± 19 2 1.7 198 ± 34 2 1.7
AUF1 p45 RGG5A 2157 ± 261 21 7.5 1813 ± 432 18 7.1
AUF1 p45 R272A 230 ± 18 2.2 1.9 201 ± 31 2 1.7
AUF1 p45 R278A 257 ± 51 2.5 2.2 242 ± 67 2.4 2.2
AUF1 p45 R280A 234 ± 56 2.2 1.9 228 ± 47 2.3 2
AUF1 p45 R282A 244 ± 60 2.3 2 234 ± 35 2.3 2
AUF1 p45 R345A 144 ± 5 1.4 0.8 139 ± 17 1.4 0.8

aDissociation constants and standard deviations derived from at least three measurements.

bKD ratio to compare binding of wildtype (WT) vs protein variant.

cThe binding free energy difference between a WT-RNA complex and a variant-RNA complex was calculated as follows: ΔΔG = -RT ln(KD WT/KD variant).