Table 3.

Comparison with latest literature results of the whole prostate segmentation.

Methods	$\mathrm{DSC}\pm \mathrm{Std}$ (%)	HD (mm)	Images	Eval method	Trim-95%	Year
Zhu10 UR-Net	93.61		80	Train:76, test:4	Yes	2018
He27 BT + CNN-ASM	$84\pm 0.04$	$6.17\pm 1.89$	Promise-12	Train:50, test:30	Yes	2017
Jecevicius28 AAM	93	4.12	Promise-12	50-fold, leave-one-out	Yes	2017
Meyer9 3D-CNN	92.10	$8.12\pm 2.89$	Prostate-$X$	Train: 25, test: 15	Yes	2018
Yu7 U + Res net	89.43	5.54	Promise-12	Train: 50, test: 30	Yes	2017
Jia11 ensemble	$91\pm 3.6$	$2.81\pm 1.29$	Promise-12	Fourfold cross validation	Yes	2018
Our HNNsc	$92.35\pm 3.00$	$8.49\pm 2.99$	145 (NIH)	Fivefold cross validation	No	2018
Our HNNsc	$88.47\pm 3.30$	$4.72\pm 1.15$	Promise-12	Train: 50, test: 30	Yes	2018