Table 4.
Comparison of the performance of MiCoP and MetaPhlAn2 on a mock viral community consisting of 9 species
| Precision | Recall | F1-Score | Reads per minute | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiCoP | 0.875 | 0.77778 | 0.82353 | 87629 |
| MetaPhlAn2 | 1.0 | 0.11111 | 0.19999 | 162845 |
MetaPhlAn2 only detects 1 of 9 species, with no false positives, while MiCoP detects 7 of 9 species with one false positive, thus profiling the community much more accurately. MetaPhlAn2 processed the reads about twice as fast as MiCoP