Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 6;20(Suppl 5):423. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5699-9

Table 4.

Comparison of the performance of MiCoP and MetaPhlAn2 on a mock viral community consisting of 9 species

Precision Recall F1-Score Reads per minute
MiCoP 0.875 0.77778 0.82353 87629
MetaPhlAn2 1.0 0.11111 0.19999 162845

MetaPhlAn2 only detects 1 of 9 species, with no false positives, while MiCoP detects 7 of 9 species with one false positive, thus profiling the community much more accurately. MetaPhlAn2 processed the reads about twice as fast as MiCoP