Table 5.
Comparison of the genus-level performance of MiCoP and MetaPhlAn2 on a mock fungal community consisting of 4 genera
Precision | Recall | F1-Score | Reads per minute | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MiCoP | 1.0 | 0.75 | 0.85714 | 6934 |
MetaPhlAn2 | NaN (0/0) | 0.0 | NaN | 187961 |
MiCoP detects 3 of the 4 genera with no false positives, while MetaPhlAn2 detects nothing. Because MetaPhlAn2 has 0 true and false positives, precision cannot be computed. MetaPhlAn2 was faster, but MiCoP still finished in less than 3 h