Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2018 Dec 6;20(6):664–675. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.11.010

Table 2.

Responsiveness by Prospective Global Pain of Changea

CAMEO Trial SPACE Trial SSSM Trial

Pain change MeanSRM Scoreb change SRMc (95% CI) P-valued Scoreb change SRMc (95% CI) P-valued Scoreb change SRMc (95% CI) P-valued

PROMIS-PI 4a .0007 <.0001 <.0001

• Better .87 5.31 .80 (.44,1.2) .111 8.11 1.22 (0.98,1.5) <.0001 5.64 .60 (.04,.80) <.0001
• Same .40 2.57 .36 (.15,.57) -- 3.45 .76 (.59,.95) -- 0.47 .08 (−.12,.28) --
• Worse −.52 −2.39 −.53 (−.98,−.12) .018 −0.82 −.17 (−.73,.35) .014 −7.68 −.86 (−1.2,−.59) <.0001

PROMIS-PI 6a .004 <.0001 <.0001

• Better .83 4.97 .77 (.35,1.3) .277 8.06 1.15 (.93,1.4) <.0001 5.47 .57 (.38,.76) .0003
• Same .39 2.83 .38 (.16,.60) -- 3.33 .70 (.52,.89) -- 0.61 .10 (−.10,.29) --
• Worse −.50 −1.95 −.51 (−.11,−.04) .028 −0.41 −.10 (−.74,.40) .052 −7.88 −.88 (−1.2,−.62) <.0001

PROMIS-PI 8a .001 <.0001 <.0001

• Better .87 4.58 .72 (.34,1.1) .287 7.81 1.19 (.95,1.5) <.0001 5.68 .61 (.43,.80) <.0001
• Same .41 2.54 .36 (.14,.59) -- 3.49 .77 (.58,.97) -- 0.51 .09 (−.11,.28) --
• Worse −.46 −1.46 −.40 (−.92,.08) .066 −0.51 −.13 (−.76,.37) .024 −7.84 −.86 (−1.2,−.59) <.0001

PROMIS 6b .006 <.0001 <.0001

• Better .82 4.75 .69 (.35,1.1) .053 7.04 1.18 (1.00,1.4) <.0001 5.57 .60 (.42,.78 .0003
• Same .36 1.84 .30 (.08,.52) -- 2.86 .65 (.47,.85) -- 0.71 .12 (−.08,.31) --
• Worse −.40 −0.74 −.20 (−.76,.29) .26 −0.41 −.10 (−.74,.39) .056 −8.51 −.91 (−1.2, −.66) <.0001

PROMIS average

• Better .85 .75 1.19 .60
• Same .39 .35 .72 .10
• Worse −.47 −.41 −.13 −.88

BPI Interference <.0001 <.0001 <.0001

• Better .87 1.66 .65 (.35,.97) .119 2.70 1.21 (.99,1.4) <.0001 1.81 .75 (.58,.93) <.0001
• Same .50 0.89 .58 (.35,.83) -- 1.20 .78 (.58,.99) -- 0.19 .13 (−.07,.33) --
• Worse −.50 −1.06 −.57 (−1.2,−.09) .0007 −0.13 −.12 (−.83,.38) .027 −2.13 −.82 (−1.1,−.57) <.0001

PEG <.0001 <.0001 <.0001

• Better 1.02 2.02 .85 (.60,1.1) .0007 2.85 1.45 (1.23,1.7) <.0001 1.93 .77 (.59,.97) <.0001
• Same .50 0.67 .45 (.24,.67) -- 1.30 .94 (.73,1.2) -- 0.15 .10 (−.09,.30) --
• Worse −.60 −1.22 −.87 (−1.6,−.34) .0003 −0.13 −.07 (−.62,.45) .007 −2.11 −.87 (−1.1,−.64) <.0001

SF Bodily Pain ∥ .013

• Better 10.18 .50 (.20,.80) .296
• Same 5.14 .37 (.12,.63) --
• Worse −4.44 −.31 (−1.1,.20) .084

Roland-Morris .055

• Better 2.18 .49 (.18,.83) .138
• Same 0.62 .16 (−.05,.38) --
• Worse −0.44 −.10 (−.59,.40) .59
a

Total N (better, same, worse) with baseline and follow-up data in CAMEO = 135 (38, 79, 18); in SPACE = 222 (94, 112, 16); and in SSM = 238 (83, 100, 55)

b

Score change = baseline - follow-up (positive score: improvement, negative score: worsening)

c

SRM = baseline – follow-up/SD change score

d

bolded P-values are from omnibus ANOVA tests comparing changes scores among 3global ratings of change groups. Other P-values are derived from t-test comparing change scores between reference (i.e. “same”) and changed (“better” or “worse”) groups and were adjusted for multiple comparison