Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2019 Jul-Aug;40(4):961–980. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000681

Table 6:

Results of BDOTS analysis for Figure 6. For fit quality, number of fits are shown either assuming autoregressive error (AR1) or not (if better fits could be obtained without it).

Panel Comparison Fit quality Subjects Statistics Significant Regions
Criteria AR1 Non AR1
6A Correct vs. Onset MP R2>=0.95
R2>=0.8
R2<0.8
Dropped
53
0
0
0
3
0
0
NH: 28 ɑ* = 0.0014 ρ = 0.9982 Correct > Onset
420 – 3000
Correct vs. Offset MP R2>=0.95
R2>=0.8
R2<0.8
Dropped
44
6
0
1
5
0
0
NH: 27 ɑ* = 0.0012 ρ = 0.9972 Correct > Offset
496 – 3000
6B Onset MP vs. Offset MP R2>=0.95
R2>=0.8
R2<0.8
Dropped
100
6
0
0
5
1
0
NH: 28 ɑ* = 0.0018 ρ = 0.9990 Onset > Offset
504 – 1220
Offset > Onset
1672 – 3000
*

α is the α adjusted for family wise error

ρ is the autocorrelation among t-statistics used to compute α*

Significant regions described in msec.