Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 22;3(3):344–353. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50140

Table 2.

Characteristics of marked metastases

No. of marked metastases (n = 76)
Size of metastases (mm)
At diagnosis* 13·6(5·6)
At specific treatment 7·6(7·2)
Marking techniques
Total no. of fiducial markers 89
Local anaesthesia (no. of patients) 24
Guiding technique
US
No. of CRLM 42
No. of fiducial markers 50
CEUS
No. of CRLM 13
No. of fiducial markers 15
CT
No. of CRLM 13
No. of fiducial markers 16
US–MRI
No. of CRLM 3
No. of fiducial markers 3
US–CT
No. of CRLM 5
No. of fiducial markers 5
Complications 4 (4)
Treatment of marked metastases
Thermoablation (21 patients) 43 (57)
RFA 32
MWA 10
Cryotherapy 1
Surgery (15 patients) 22 (29)
Metastasectomy 17
Segmentectomy 2
Major hepatectomy 3
Size at diagnosis (mm)* 15·8(6·9)
Size at surgery (mm)* 8·9(8·3)
Histological size (mm)* 11·9(7·1)
Pathological response (% viable cells)* 32(25)
Radiotherapy (1 patient) 1 (1)
No specific treatment (progression) (6 patients) 10 (13)

Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise; values are

*

mean(s.d.) and

mean(s.d.) based on 37 patients (6 patients with 14 marked metastases were excluded because of progression).

Total number of complications for total number of fiducial markers placed. CRLM, colorectal liver metastases; US, ultrasonography; CEUS, contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; MWA, microwave ablation.