Table 2.
Advantages |
Glenoid fixation of the SCR graft is theoretically improved owing to the technique using suture tapes with 3 points of fixation in the strong subchondral bone of the glenoid. |
Theoretic improvement in the ease of graft introduction occurs in comparison with the double-pulley technique because the graft can be pushed into the fixation point with the anchor and shaft of the anchor inserter. |
Restoring superior capsular stability through superior capsular reconstruction theoretically decreases rotator cuff repair failures due to superior capsular insufficiency that is typically present in these massive rotator cuff tears. |
The decreased superior capsular distance and re-centering of the humeral head decrease tension on the repair and theoretically improve healing through early protection of the repair. |
Maintenance of the decreased SCD during early healing protects the repair, with a theoretical “biologic internal brace” of the rotator cuff repair. |
Soft-tissue augmentation provides a biologic scaffold and increases the strength of the repair construct. |
Disadvantages |
The need for direct suture management is increased. |
The expense of the repair, because of the need for additional anchors and tapes in the glenoid, as well as the cost of acellular dermal allograft, must be considered. |
SCD, superior capsular distance; SCR, superior capsular reconstruction.