Skip to main content
. 2019 May 30;15:1487–1495. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S196930

Table 3.

Patient versus physician perceptions of aspects of PD

Mean rating comparison Independent t-test
All patients All physicians Mean difference Confidence interval P-value
Validc n Mean Validc n Mean Lower Upper
Important factors in determining PD medicinea
 Efficacy profile (physicians) vs
controlling your symptoms well (patients)
63 6.16 70 6.21 −0.056 −0.421 0.310 0.764
 Safety or tolerability profile (physicians) vs
few or no side effects (patients)
62 6.05 70 6.03 0.020 −0.387 0.427 0.923
 Form of delivery (physicians) vs easy to
take (patients)
63 5.73 70 5.16 0.573 0.104 1.042 0.0169
 Cost to patient (physicians) vs affordable
medicine (patients)
63 5.84 70 5.53 0.313 −0.134 0.760 0.169
Patient knowledge of PDb
 Knowledge of PD in general 66 4.76 70 5.17 −0.414 −0.839 0.011 0.056
 Medication options for PD 64 4.69 70 5.07 −0.384 −0.859 0.091 0.112
 Side effects of PD medication 66 4.64 70 5.21 −0.578 −1.055 −0.101 0.018
 Availability of patient support resources 65 4.12 70 4.93 −0.805 −1.359 −0.251 0.005
 Methods for coping with PD (physicians) vs practical ways for coping with PD (patients) 64 4.75 70 4.73 0.021 −0.430 0.473 0.925

Notes: a1= no importance (physicians)/not at all important (patients); 7= extremely high importance (physicians)/very important (patients). b1= not at all informed/I know very little; 7= extremely well informed/I know a lot. cFor physicians, this only includes those who completed PRFs; for patients, this only includes those with matching PRFs.

Abbreviation: PD, Parkinson’s disease.