Table 1.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages	Disadvantages
Our procedure can significantly reinforce the Bankart procedure in cases of poor-quality glenohumeral ligaments by the synergy of the anterior labroplasty and sling effect of dynamic tenodesis.	Our procedure requires significant surgical skills.
Our procedure is less traumatic and technically demanding than the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.	There is a risk of axillary nerve injury during the perforation of subscapularis muscle perforation from the inside-outward direction.
Our procedure can be performed in “beach chair” or lateral decubitus position.	Theoretically, there is a possibility of biceps pain after the procedure.
Our procedure can be performed in cases of subcritical glenoid bone loss if there are any doubts in choosing soft-tissue or bone reconstruction procedure.	It is not recommended in cases of poor quality of the biceps tendon or previous procedures with biceps tenodesis or tenotomy.
Our procedure can be performed together with bone block or remplissage techniques.	In cases of glenoid bone loss >20% or significant Hill-Sachs lesions, it is not recommended to perform our technique as a single procedure without additional techniques.
In case of superior labral lesion from anterior to posterior tears, our procedure simultaneously treats this pathology.	It is not recommended in case of total absence of the capsule structure.